tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4352923580560218489.post3200621551300296617..comments2008-08-26T16:20:50.690-04:00Willbur Flatshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15770989688590765121noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4352923580560218489.post-6021501179143523472008-08-26T16:20:00.000-04:002008-08-26T16:20:00.000-04:00This is fantastic! I almost didn't see the "LURKER" disguised in the shirt and thought it was just a run of the mill camo, VERY COOL!Kevinhttp://blog.youdesignit.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4352923580560218489.post-51365725691427504222008-08-25T21:23:00.000-04:002008-08-25T21:23:00.000-04:00i, personally much rather prefer the term "creeper" lol.cheezisyum21http://cheezisyum21.livejournal.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4352923580560218489.post-86455673087041838512008-08-25T13:26:00.000-04:002008-08-25T13:26:00.000-04:00I'm in the same boat -- I definitely thought of stalker immediately.<BR/><BR/>Sometimes you have to wonder what t-shirt designers are thinking when they create tees that self-identify the wearer in an unflattering or uncomfortable way. For example, wearing an <A HREF="http://www.shirtsonsale.info/2008/08/shirtaday-ultimate-wingman.html" REL="nofollow">ultimate wingman</A> shirt immediately degrades your ability to be any sort of wingman and wearing a "lurker" shirt automatically "outs" you and kind of kills your whole lurker status.Edenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00480648635270959595noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4352923580560218489.post-16592986497801107662008-08-25T10:22:00.000-04:002008-08-25T10:22:00.000-04:00I'm not sure if it's just me, but the first thing that came to my mind when I saw this is, stalker!Mingshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05517569286676796053noreply@blogger.com